EU 2020 - Follow-up of the informal European Council of 11 February 2010

Debate by VANHECKE Frank 

on Belgium,   Europe,   European Union,   Federalism,   Geography,   Guy Verhofstadt,   Maastricht,   Politics,  

This document has been automatically translated from nl. Check the original if you want to be sure of the text

Let me first calm down we are having this debate in this House, in Brussels, Belgium. The country Belgium we can - without in the least exaggerating - in this economic context described as the North Sea to Greece. For this country, Belgium, Greece and Italy after the largest percentage of government throughout Europe. We have a fundamentally sick within Europe, and that is not in the least the merit - if I can call it that - of one of the speakers, former Prime Minister Verhofstadt, who cheats on artificial adornment of budgets and could even give lessons to the Greeks! Let us therefore not to blow itself too seriously. We especially say that we can avert the crisis by creating more debt, the famous Verhofstadt's proposal for a European government bond once it ever will be paid by someone. They are contrary always been that European decisions have led us to the crisis, European decisions to the Maastricht criteria and the Stability Pact in the bin tipper to à la tête du client, because Europe was ahead. The same stubbornness that Eurocratic us the accession strategy for Turkey by the throat pushes, the geographical and economic realities and must give European citizens pay for the massive potential entry of a country that not even European. The solution is not Europe. The solution is national responsibility and the obligation of the individual countries to fuck to put the padding.

ParsedMarch 5th, 2010 6:58 AM
DateFebruary 24th, 2010
RefP7_CRE-PROV(2010)02-24
Originaleuroparl